Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. F70 & F100 Professional
  5. F100 - ATS and Landing behaviour

F100 - ATS and Landing behaviour

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved F70 & F100 Professional
24 Posts 13 Posters 2.8k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jvtbaldsJ jvtbalds

    @Crabby

    Thanks for the refresher on VNAV and Flight Director operations, but I believe the main point of my report was missed.

    I operate in virtual aviation with the exact same standards and rigor that I apply in the real-world aircraft I fly for a living.

    I bring the same situational awareness and mindset to the sim as I would if the machine were real. I’m fully aware that automation is merely an assist and that reverting to manual flight (doing “””pilot crap”””) is the standard procedure when a system misbehaves.

    The issue I am pointing out isn't a misinterpretation of the FD or a lack of understanding of basic autoflight logic. The problem is that the system responds aggressively and erratically in perfectly calm air. In a scenario with absolutely no variations in wind direction, wind speed, or local pressure, the system failing to manage basic pitch and power coordination is extremely strange. I am not looking for flawless automation to compensate for poor piloting technique, I am simply reporting an anomaly in the addon's flight control logic that behaves unrealistically in neutral atmospheric conditions.

    CrabbyC Offline
    CrabbyC Offline
    Crabby
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @jvtbalds Call me confused. I kept seeing reports of sluggish behavior not aggressive. I will keep a closer eye on it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pedropolakP pedropolak

      @Crabby A/T seems sluggish, but I don't think it's supposed to allow the speed to drop by as much as 30 knots below the selected value, leading to speeds even below VMA.

      And then, according to the manuals:
      ATS is supposed to be used in all flight modes, all the way to landing.

      As the manuals says:

      "ATS during Landing
      During landing, automatic thrust lever retardation to idle occurs below 50 ft AGL.
      The FMA will show RET in the thrust window."

      And also:

      "AUTOMATIC GUST CORRECTION
      During approach in gusty wind conditions, ATS will control to a speed not below VMA +8. VMA and VSEL at the PFD are not affected."

      So, Guys and Gals, these passages give me reason to believe that, as sluggish as the AT may be, it shouldn't be that imprecise....

      CrabbyC Offline
      CrabbyC Offline
      Crabby
      wrote last edited by Crabby
      #16

      @pedropolak I am still not through with the actual FCOM, however, straight from the US Airways FCOM:
      LANDING
      Except for autoland approaches, switch off the ATS at 50 feet or above.
      Start to initiate a flare at approximately 30 feet for a manual landing.
      For autoland approaches, monitor the thrust lever movement to idle. For all
      other approaches, retard the thrust levers manually back to idle. After an
      autoland, the autopilot has to be switched off before 60 knots.

      Just got done scanning the Alliance FCOM and it reads the same. I understand the manuals provided may say different (I have not read them past recommended settings. I have various FCOMs and that is what I learn on), however there is no FCOM recommendation to use the ATS from start to finish.

      Granted, there could be another operator SOP that says ATS is to always be used. I know that is the case for the 777. I just can't find reference to that in real documents.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        TheFly77
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        I experience the same. Using MSFS 2024. The aircraft struggles to maintain speed, the autopilot seems to be too slow in response, resulting in unrealistic large pitch oscillations and large thrust corrections. It would be nice if JF could tweak this behaviour and make the autopilot more responsive.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • O Offline
          O Offline
          OELVA
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          Wanted to step in here too to report a surprisingly large variation of speeds during an approach in calm weather conditions.
          Approach speed varies in a range of like 20 to 30kt when handled by ATS and I've found it to be super super difficult to manage energy on approach an landing.
          I've done three flights so far and every APP was messed up to an extent that I should have gone around.
          Been flying various sims and different aircraft (yep, Boeing and Airbus) for 20 years now and always been able to quickly get used to new environment. Sure, a part of my bad approaches are due to differences between Fokker and A/B which I just have to get used to but it feels like some parameters of the addon could use a little fine tuning too.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            FD1003
            wrote last edited by FD1003
            #19

            I'm not sure it's all the ATS' and A/P's fault. I'm not sure how it's calculated in the real aircraft, but I've seen that the speed trend indication is very very responsive, much more so than in any other aircraft I've flown. I usually never use ATS on final (in any plane), but I've basically having to force myself to disregard the speed trend indication or I would end up doing some very excessive and unnecessary throttle changes myself (something that did happen for the first half of my first approach, before I noticed).

            Also, even though it's slightly off topic, since someone mentioned FLCH, if you fly manually and have the F/D vertical mode in FLCH you'll see that the flight director has a similar problem, the commands are very large and vary very quickly. Maybe this can throw off the A/P and ATS?

            Next flight I do I'll try to get some footage of both of these things.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Offline
              O Offline
              OELVA
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              Had a vAPP of 121kn today and I didn't manage to perform a stable approach.
              Aircraft accelerated to 160kn and even higher as you can see on this screenshot (wasn't able to record a video quickly enough):

              grafik.png

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                storemaster
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                Is there any fix for the "nose down at ap disconnect" and massive trim up needed on the horizon?

                pedropolakP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S storemaster

                  Is there any fix for the "nose down at ap disconnect" and massive trim up needed on the horizon?

                  pedropolakP Offline
                  pedropolakP Offline
                  pedropolak
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @storemaster For a moment I thoguht Flaps 25 instead of 40 was a way around, but talking to friend that looked like just a coincidence.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O OELVA

                    Had a vAPP of 121kn today and I didn't manage to perform a stable approach.
                    Aircraft accelerated to 160kn and even higher as you can see on this screenshot (wasn't able to record a video quickly enough):

                    grafik.png

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    Gatlingorange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @OELVA Second this. I had erratic speed changes up to 160kts, all the way from 121kts which was selected.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • MartynM Offline
                      MartynM Offline
                      Martyn
                      JF Staff
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      In addition to refinements to all areas of the AFCAS and ATS logic, the v1.2 update will include a reworked auto-trim system, which should fix the issue with the aircraft not being trimmed when disengaging the autopilot.

                      Martyn - Development Manager

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users