Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. Black Square Add-Ons
  5. Commander 114
  6. Flying without an HSI

Flying without an HSI

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Commander 114
15 Posts 10 Posters 633 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z Offline
    Z Offline
    Zacke
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    Hey guys,

    short question relating to this subject: When flying with RNAV or KLN-90B where are the heading info does come from respectively what will happen if the DG is continually loosing it's correct heading thru drift?
    I think at least the RNAV system is relying on the DG.

    Regards,
    Zacke

    SadBucketS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      kityatyi
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      Imagine the owner spending all that money on the 750/650 combo, only to fly without an HSI? Unlikely. Can happen, but unlikely. An optional HSI would be more than beneficial.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • D Downwind

        Yes, that’s how it is with old school instruments. During my flight training a long time ago we didn’t even had a heading bug! But if you fly the Commander with a GPS (530, 750 etc) you can use the OBS to visualise the runway heading

        G Offline
        G Offline
        Gatlingorange
        wrote last edited by Gatlingorange
        #7

        @Downwind you mean by having the OBS being displayed as a track on the ND? Would be cool to have an HSI integrated. As far as I'm aware it's not.

        Even though I appreciate the effort of all the avionics, having an option for a HSI in the suite would be very welcoming.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • G Gatlingorange

          @Downwind you mean by having the OBS being displayed as a track on the ND? Would be cool to have an HSI integrated. As far as I'm aware it's not.

          Even though I appreciate the effort of all the avionics, having an option for a HSI in the suite would be very welcoming.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Downwind
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @Gatlingorange As an option it would be nice as long as the more or less original state of the aircraft is also kept. I love old school flying. But flying IFR nowadays is hardly possible without a GPS and a mode S transponder

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Z Zacke

            Hey guys,

            short question relating to this subject: When flying with RNAV or KLN-90B where are the heading info does come from respectively what will happen if the DG is continually loosing it's correct heading thru drift?
            I think at least the RNAV system is relying on the DG.

            Regards,
            Zacke

            SadBucketS Offline
            SadBucketS Offline
            SadBucket
            wrote last edited by SadBucket
            #9

            @Zacke As far as I understand it, the RNAV 511 doesn't actually know the aircrafts heading. It identifies the radial you are on using the phase difference between the VOR’s reference and variable signals. That phase difference tells the receiver your magnetic azimuth from the station, regardless of which direction the aircraft is facing. Think of it like a rotating lighthouse with a separate “north” flash: the lighthouse flashes in every direction when its beam points north, the beam then rotates clockwise, the receiver measures how long after the north flash the rotating beam reaches you, the time delay tells you your direction from the lighthouse. It then combines that radial with DME distance to determine your position relative to the VOR and calculate the bearing and distance to the entered waypoint...

            Regarding the KLN-90B and other GPS units, they can only gather directional track information from movement. IRL on initial startup while stationary, depending on the unit and if the unit is in track up mode, it will either face aircraft north, or at it's last known track until movement is made and a track can be identified. The GPS satellites themselves provide the aircraft with position, groundspeed, and ground track, not aircraft heading. I haven't really paid attention to how/if different GPS units simulate this properly in the sim.

            *Side note: Some GPS units can be equipped with external inputs connecting the unit to the aircraft’s heading system allowing for HDG up display (this would connect to an AHRS/ directional gyro/ etc...).

            CPL MIFR 🍁

            Black SquareB 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • SadBucketS SadBucket

              @Zacke As far as I understand it, the RNAV 511 doesn't actually know the aircrafts heading. It identifies the radial you are on using the phase difference between the VOR’s reference and variable signals. That phase difference tells the receiver your magnetic azimuth from the station, regardless of which direction the aircraft is facing. Think of it like a rotating lighthouse with a separate “north” flash: the lighthouse flashes in every direction when its beam points north, the beam then rotates clockwise, the receiver measures how long after the north flash the rotating beam reaches you, the time delay tells you your direction from the lighthouse. It then combines that radial with DME distance to determine your position relative to the VOR and calculate the bearing and distance to the entered waypoint...

              Regarding the KLN-90B and other GPS units, they can only gather directional track information from movement. IRL on initial startup while stationary, depending on the unit and if the unit is in track up mode, it will either face aircraft north, or at it's last known track until movement is made and a track can be identified. The GPS satellites themselves provide the aircraft with position, groundspeed, and ground track, not aircraft heading. I haven't really paid attention to how/if different GPS units simulate this properly in the sim.

              *Side note: Some GPS units can be equipped with external inputs connecting the unit to the aircraft’s heading system allowing for HDG up display (this would connect to an AHRS/ directional gyro/ etc...).

              Black SquareB Offline
              Black SquareB Offline
              Black Square
              Black Square Developer
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @SadBucket All 100% true. I was waiting for someone to post an excellent explanation. It's a common misconception that a VOR receiver needs some knowledge of your orientation to produce what you see in the cockpit, but it's completely heading-agnostic.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Z Offline
                Z Offline
                Zacke
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                Thanks a lot for the exceptional explanations. Got that completely! 😉

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kityatyi
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @Black-Square would you consider adding an optional HSI such as the KI 525A?

                  An HSI would absolutely make the Commander one of my fav Black Square aircraft. Sadly, it's been rusting in my virtual hangar since purchase. I simply cannot convince myself to fly it, so much so that I somewhat regret I purchased it. 😞

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    MatzeH84
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    Just my personal opinion, while a HSI certainly makes life easier, I really enjoy the Commander not having one.
                    It's more demanding to combine different instrument sources to get a mental picture for sure, but I find it more rewarding to fly it this way.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • WooliesW Offline
                      WooliesW Offline
                      Woolies
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      Yep totally agree. It is actually nice to have an aircraft that is a bit different and not with all the bells n whistles

                      https://www.twitch.tv/woolies

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • V Offline
                        V Offline
                        Voxen
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        Agreed, the Commander is really nice to fly as it is. No GPS, just old school navigation. Love it.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users