RJ Professional

Cheers chaps, That's done the trick! Many thanks for the help. Regards Ben

@andrewd251 Thank you for reporting this. We have been able to replicate an issue where pressing the PRV/NXT keys on an empty STORED FLIGHT PLAN page can cause the FMS to freeze. This has been logged on our internal bugs tracker for our development team to investigate. Mark - Just Flight

Thank you!

@Mark fab! Thank you

Got it thank you

@Mark , perfect. Thanks for the clarification. I know I'm well out of the norm from most users but the sims IFR ATC is awful and was one of the reasons for my limited use of the 146. I think I will replace it with the RJ now.

@rj Thank you for the feedback. It's one of those very specific things that we could never find an answer for in the FCOMs, so we based the logic on what we have seen in other aircraft. We've logged that on our internal bugs tracker to look into. Mark - Just Flight

Thanks, that helps!

Thank you for the feedback. With regards to the ground effect feedback, I don't believe this is something we have been fed back from the flight models in the 146 or RJ, but we will continue to monitor the forums for any other feedback. It is worth considering that a lightly loaded RJ70 will likely be more affected by ground effect than an RJ100 at maximum landing weight though. It may also be worth experimenting with the "Turbulence" option in MSFS (located at MSFS Options > Assistance Options > User Experience). Setting this to LOW or MEDIUM can lead to more accurate wind conditions within the simulator at low altitudes (this is based on real pilot feedback from our testing teams). Mark - Just Flight

@flightstrike Hi. No ... as auto-throttle was on and autoland, I'd reduced them 'physically' to idle. But heh, it was my first autoland so I need to read the manual a bit more. And I use a 3rd Party Cardiff EGFF so I know elevation and ILS angles can be 'problematic'. Prolly a good idea to test it on a stock airport.

Has anyone else had problems with pressurization issues. I have tried everything to get the plane to pressurize. I have packs on, app air on. I've also tried all engine switches on and app air off, im also in auto. But I can never pressurize. Cabin air is always the same as altitude. Also outflow switch is normal, but the outflow valves are always open. As the green lights are one. Am I missing something? Thanks

Page 18 under Displays and Controls: Row 2 indicates cabin two ambient pressure differential; I assume this is supposed to be cabin to ambient?

Quick update on my first point. The oscillation in pitch happens in both lvl change and in vs whether beginning a descent or climb. It seems like the aircraft over compensates the fpm of climb or descent and then tries to correct itself but overcorrects. Thus it begins to oscillate up and down.

We haven't removed any liveries from the RJ package, just added additional liveries. We've never had an Aer Lingus livery for the RJ85 (there is an Aer Lingus livery for the 146-300 which you may have seen some 146 screenshots of), and we've only got the Braathens livery for the RJ85 (not the RJ100). We are starting to see some RJ liveries being posted on flightsim.to, so it may not be too long until a community member completes those two liveries. Mark - Just Flight

The correct way to disengage the autopilot in the RJ is to press the red AP DISC button on one of the yokes. If the autopilot has been forced off by other means, the autopilot "cavalry charge" audio can also be silenced by pressing the AP DISC button on the yoke. This can also be triggered using the TOGGLE DISENGAGE AUTOPILOT or TOGGLE AUTOPILOT MASTER control assignments. It may also be worth considering that the Autopilot DISENGAGE switch on the MCP is only typically used in an emergency. If this switch is activated, the autopilot cannot be reengaged until this switch is returned to the up position. it may cause the autopilot "cavalry charge" audio to play until the switch has been reset and the AP DISC button pressed. Hope that helps. Mark - Just Flight

@Mark Thank you very much!

@Melon ... This is a royal pain. Surely a hidden click spot would be easier ? They have those for one or two other functions.

@Mark Thank you very much!