Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. P3D & FSX Products
  4. Traffic Global P3D/FSX
  5. New development build

New development build

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Global P3D/FSX
44 Posts 7 Posters 18.0k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M may433

    Uninstalled the previous version through Control Panel. Installed this version in P3D v4.5 as an administrator. Running the compiler with just the box for Traffic Global Flight Plans ticked. The compiler has been running for some 15 minutes so checked the Task Manager and it shows:

    Traffic App (32 bit) running at 0%

    Should the Traffic App not be 64 bit? And does it normally take this long to compile as I am sure that previous versions did not take this long.

    John

    V Offline
    V Offline
    vortexwake
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @may433
    Uninstalling/reinstalling should only be done using the TG installer by running the .exe of the older or newer version of TG. Using the Control Panel function to remove an older version of TG can leave remnants of the older version behind in the registry that can lead to problems when trying to reinstall an updated or newer version of TG.

    This may result in the 'hang time' that your seeing while trying to complete the compiler process.

    Using the Task Manager to force a stop of the compiling process will shut the TG UI down and allow you to attempt it again, but you may have to run the TG .exe again first, in order to remove any trace of the older version before reinstalling the latest version, (v1.1.1.4) and then running the compiler process again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M may433

      Uninstalled the previous version through Control Panel. Installed this version in P3D v4.5 as an administrator. Running the compiler with just the box for Traffic Global Flight Plans ticked. The compiler has been running for some 15 minutes so checked the Task Manager and it shows:

      Traffic App (32 bit) running at 0%

      Should the Traffic App not be 64 bit? And does it normally take this long to compile as I am sure that previous versions did not take this long.

      John

      RichR Offline
      RichR Offline
      Rich
      JF Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      @may433
      Hi John,
      Could you give it a go and verify that you've selected both the TG flight plans and also P3Dv4 in the sim selection window.
      Also could you set the rest of it up in this configuration:

      tg.png

      All being well, that should compile in five minutes or so. Whilst its doing it's work, you should see it taking up a noticeable chunk of CPU % in the task manager. If it's sitting at 0% then it's probably hung up on something.
      Note, the commercial traffic part of the program hasn't changed yet. It is being worked on at the moment, but the main changes are the cargo and ga modes, so I'd recommend compiling them as well.
      The app should be running as a 32bit program.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Capt QuirkC Offline
        Capt QuirkC Offline
        Capt Quirk
        wrote on last edited by Capt Quirk
        #10

        I've just finished completely reinstalling FSX (boxed), FSX-SE and TG v1.1.1.4 from scratch and compiled the TG traffic (airline, cargo & GA) all of which went without a hitch....but....

        the following models seem to be invisible in FSX & FSX-SE in both dx9 & dx10 (just to confirm this, I loaded them all as flyable aircraft with the same result):

        B58 Baron
        B36 Bonanza
        C152
        C208 Grand Caravan [error msg: 'visual model could not be displayed']
        C172 Skyhawk [error msg: 'visual model could not be displayed'] [all fltsim entries have ui_type="C152" in aircraft.cfg]
        C550 Citation
        B200 Kingair [error msg: 'visual model could not be displayed']
        Piper Cherokee

        the Learjet appeared ok though🙂

        the only other time I've seen this (or..not, in this case) in FSX is when there's a 64bit model used which could not be displayed in a 32bit program.

        RichR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          may433
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Rich,

          Thanks for the prompt response. Tried it exactly as your screeenshot but this time I got the unhandled exception message saying

          Access to the path
          'C:\Windows/system32\systemprofile\AppData\Local\MicrosfotWindows\NetCache\Content.IE5' is denied

          I have reverted to the previous version for the moment.

          John

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Capt QuirkC Capt Quirk

            I've just finished completely reinstalling FSX (boxed), FSX-SE and TG v1.1.1.4 from scratch and compiled the TG traffic (airline, cargo & GA) all of which went without a hitch....but....

            the following models seem to be invisible in FSX & FSX-SE in both dx9 & dx10 (just to confirm this, I loaded them all as flyable aircraft with the same result):

            B58 Baron
            B36 Bonanza
            C152
            C208 Grand Caravan [error msg: 'visual model could not be displayed']
            C172 Skyhawk [error msg: 'visual model could not be displayed'] [all fltsim entries have ui_type="C152" in aircraft.cfg]
            C550 Citation
            B200 Kingair [error msg: 'visual model could not be displayed']
            Piper Cherokee

            the Learjet appeared ok though🙂

            the only other time I've seen this (or..not, in this case) in FSX is when there's a 64bit model used which could not be displayed in a 32bit program.

            RichR Offline
            RichR Offline
            Rich
            JF Staff
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            @Capt-Quirk

            Thanks for the report. I've just fixed this and added the files to a new installer. As we're heading into a holiday in the UK I'm not sure if my colleague with the keys to the upload server is going to be around in the next few days though. If it's not sorted soon I'll send you a link to where you can get the updated MDL files at least.

            @may433
            That's a strange error message. Content.IE5 isn't something that I reference in the code. It might perhaps be something that I do use then uses itself, but I've no idea what that could be. Was that path copied exactly? It has a slash going the wrong way and some garbled info in the middle. If that is a literal report of the error then it might be that there is a Windows reg entry with some bad data in it.

            M Capt QuirkC 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • RichR Rich

              @Capt-Quirk

              Thanks for the report. I've just fixed this and added the files to a new installer. As we're heading into a holiday in the UK I'm not sure if my colleague with the keys to the upload server is going to be around in the next few days though. If it's not sorted soon I'll send you a link to where you can get the updated MDL files at least.

              @may433
              That's a strange error message. Content.IE5 isn't something that I reference in the code. It might perhaps be something that I do use then uses itself, but I've no idea what that could be. Was that path copied exactly? It has a slash going the wrong way and some garbled info in the middle. If that is a literal report of the error then it might be that there is a Windows reg entry with some bad data in it.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              may433
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              @Rich This is a screenshot of the message. My typing error in my last entry - sorry

              TG Install problem.jpg

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • RichR Rich

                @Capt-Quirk

                Thanks for the report. I've just fixed this and added the files to a new installer. As we're heading into a holiday in the UK I'm not sure if my colleague with the keys to the upload server is going to be around in the next few days though. If it's not sorted soon I'll send you a link to where you can get the updated MDL files at least.

                @may433
                That's a strange error message. Content.IE5 isn't something that I reference in the code. It might perhaps be something that I do use then uses itself, but I've no idea what that could be. Was that path copied exactly? It has a slash going the wrong way and some garbled info in the middle. If that is a literal report of the error then it might be that there is a Windows reg entry with some bad data in it.

                Capt QuirkC Offline
                Capt QuirkC Offline
                Capt Quirk
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                @Rich
                No worries, Rich....thanks for the quick fix. No rush for the upload given the current situation!
                Hope you have a safe and happy break from 'routine' (whatever that is these days😁 )

                V 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Capt QuirkC Capt Quirk

                  @Rich
                  No worries, Rich....thanks for the quick fix. No rush for the upload given the current situation!
                  Hope you have a safe and happy break from 'routine' (whatever that is these days😁 )

                  V Offline
                  V Offline
                  vortexwake
                  wrote on last edited by vortexwake
                  #15

                  @Capt-Quirk
                  Hi CQ
                  Just following the post traffic between you and Rich. So Rich has corrected the missing MDL files and set up a new installer for them, but the installer still has to be uploaded to the server, and this may not happen over the course of the Easter weekend due to the holiday? Do I have that right?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • RichR Offline
                    RichR Offline
                    Rich
                    JF Staff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    The new installer is up now. Just go to the EA Forum and grab it from there: https://traffic.justflight.com/topic/999/traffic-global-1-1-1-4/2

                    V 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • RichR Rich

                      The new installer is up now. Just go to the EA Forum and grab it from there: https://traffic.justflight.com/topic/999/traffic-global-1-1-1-4/2

                      V Offline
                      V Offline
                      vortexwake
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @Rich
                      Thanks Rich

                      V 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • V vortexwake

                        @Rich
                        Thanks Rich

                        V Offline
                        V Offline
                        vortexwake
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18
                        This post is deleted!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • RichR Rich

                          The new installer is up now. Just go to the EA Forum and grab it from there: https://traffic.justflight.com/topic/999/traffic-global-1-1-1-4/2

                          V Offline
                          V Offline
                          vortexwake
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          @Rich
                          The DL is still listed as 1.1.1.4 (1,455,788KB....vs. 1,459,781KB of the original DL)
                          Should it have been displayed as 1.1.1.4/2 as per the link? Or is it just the way it's uploaded?
                          Also, should the same installation instructions be followed that you posted for the original DL?

                          Thanks Rich

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Capt QuirkC Offline
                            Capt QuirkC Offline
                            Capt Quirk
                            wrote on last edited by Capt Quirk
                            #20

                            Hi Rich,

                            I've just downloaded the update/fix & uninstalled/reinstalled and am happy to report that the some of the planes are now visible in a completely clean install of FSX-SE (dx9):

                            Baron B58 still invisible, no lights and tends to taxi off the airport into the undergrowth
                            Bonanza B36 still invisible
                            C152 OK! but all the repaints are the same!
                            C208 OK!
                            C172 Skyhawk OK! but, again, all the liveries are clones
                            Citation nope, still can't see it
                            Kingair B200 OK!
                            Piper Cherokee 140 doesn't appear to even load into the sim

                            [Since this was only the results from a cursory test of flightplans created to park the planes up in a deserted airfield, I may have missed some other issues as I've not yet parked up all the repaints for each individual aircraft] Hope that's of some help, anyway.

                            Is anyone else is having similar problems, or are my cataracts a lot worse than I thought🤓 ?

                            V 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Capt QuirkC Capt Quirk

                              Hi Rich,

                              I've just downloaded the update/fix & uninstalled/reinstalled and am happy to report that the some of the planes are now visible in a completely clean install of FSX-SE (dx9):

                              Baron B58 still invisible, no lights and tends to taxi off the airport into the undergrowth
                              Bonanza B36 still invisible
                              C152 OK! but all the repaints are the same!
                              C208 OK!
                              C172 Skyhawk OK! but, again, all the liveries are clones
                              Citation nope, still can't see it
                              Kingair B200 OK!
                              Piper Cherokee 140 doesn't appear to even load into the sim

                              [Since this was only the results from a cursory test of flightplans created to park the planes up in a deserted airfield, I may have missed some other issues as I've not yet parked up all the repaints for each individual aircraft] Hope that's of some help, anyway.

                              Is anyone else is having similar problems, or are my cataracts a lot worse than I thought🤓 ?

                              V Offline
                              V Offline
                              vortexwake
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              @Capt-Quirk
                              After a quick look around I can confirm that:
                              Both Baron B58 and Bonanza B36 are invisible (didn't notice any unusual wandering off the field, but it's completely possible that they were doing this)
                              C152 is visible but with duplicate repaints
                              C208 appear to be OK
                              C172 the three (3) that I located seemed invisible...two airborne and one parked on the ramp
                              Kingair B200 didn't notice any....but can go with CQ's assessment that they're good to go
                              Cherokee 140 again didn't notice any in the look around

                              I think your eyesight is fine....more likely that as Rich said, there's still some fine tuning to be done on this one.

                              Capt QuirkC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • RichR Rich

                                The new installer is up now. Just go to the EA Forum and grab it from there: https://traffic.justflight.com/topic/999/traffic-global-1-1-1-4/2

                                V Offline
                                V Offline
                                vortexwake
                                wrote on last edited by vortexwake
                                #22

                                @Rich
                                Also Rich just on a side note....I noticed that even with 'Use Alternate Liveries' unchecked....that a Pel Air S340 and Blue Dart B757-200 were sitting on the ramp at KMEM.....actually the B757-200 was parked at a gate but I'm sure it was in cargo config.

                                Forgot...there was also a Star Track RJ85 siting on the ramp in CYYZ....but it was in a designated cargo area so at least it was paying attention to where it should be.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • V vortexwake

                                  @Capt-Quirk
                                  After a quick look around I can confirm that:
                                  Both Baron B58 and Bonanza B36 are invisible (didn't notice any unusual wandering off the field, but it's completely possible that they were doing this)
                                  C152 is visible but with duplicate repaints
                                  C208 appear to be OK
                                  C172 the three (3) that I located seemed invisible...two airborne and one parked on the ramp
                                  Kingair B200 didn't notice any....but can go with CQ's assessment that they're good to go
                                  Cherokee 140 again didn't notice any in the look around

                                  I think your eyesight is fine....more likely that as Rich said, there's still some fine tuning to be done on this one.

                                  Capt QuirkC Offline
                                  Capt QuirkC Offline
                                  Capt Quirk
                                  wrote on last edited by Capt Quirk
                                  #23

                                  @vortexwake
                                  Yep, you're right. I am now starting to see things that aren't there! 😙
                                  The C172 is invisible ....and all the Caravans appear to be clones too (though I have found just one other livery on a C152 - G-BYED)
                                  ...invisible C172 & visible C152 have no lights
                                  bit unimpressed with the hexagonal passenger windows on the Kingair!

                                  V 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Capt QuirkC Capt Quirk

                                    @vortexwake
                                    Yep, you're right. I am now starting to see things that aren't there! 😙
                                    The C172 is invisible ....and all the Caravans appear to be clones too (though I have found just one other livery on a C152 - G-BYED)
                                    ...invisible C172 & visible C152 have no lights
                                    bit unimpressed with the hexagonal passenger windows on the Kingair!

                                    V Offline
                                    V Offline
                                    vortexwake
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @Capt-Quirk
                                    Yep....I noticed that the C208's appeared as clones too.
                                    Didn't notice that the C152 and C172 didn't have any lighting.
                                    Hexagonal passenger windows in the B200 Kingair?....I'm gonna have to find one and take a look at that!
                                    I guess this is why Rich said that this build hadn't been fully fleshed out yet.

                                    Capt QuirkC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • V vortexwake

                                      @Capt-Quirk
                                      Yep....I noticed that the C208's appeared as clones too.
                                      Didn't notice that the C152 and C172 didn't have any lighting.
                                      Hexagonal passenger windows in the B200 Kingair?....I'm gonna have to find one and take a look at that!
                                      I guess this is why Rich said that this build hadn't been fully fleshed out yet.

                                      Capt QuirkC Offline
                                      Capt QuirkC Offline
                                      Capt Quirk
                                      wrote on last edited by Capt Quirk
                                      #25

                                      @vortexwake
                                      Just had a very swift look at the texture sheets for some of the GA and they do appear to be different from each other.
                                      I'm wondering if it's something to do with the fallback textures and each repaint is using that for some peculiar reason.

                                      B200 Kingair passenger windows
                                      Kingair B200 passenger windows.jpg
                                      TG B200 Kingair passenger windows.jpg
                                      TG B200 compared with Orbx static B200 (in background)
                                      B200 Kingair TG compared with ORBX static.jpg

                                      V 3 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Capt QuirkC Capt Quirk

                                        @vortexwake
                                        Just had a very swift look at the texture sheets for some of the GA and they do appear to be different from each other.
                                        I'm wondering if it's something to do with the fallback textures and each repaint is using that for some peculiar reason.

                                        B200 Kingair passenger windows
                                        Kingair B200 passenger windows.jpg
                                        TG B200 Kingair passenger windows.jpg
                                        TG B200 compared with Orbx static B200 (in background)
                                        B200 Kingair TG compared with ORBX static.jpg

                                        V Offline
                                        V Offline
                                        vortexwake
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @Capt-Quirk
                                        That's a good question about the fallback textures being used instead of the individual texture sheets for each....especially if they are as you said, apparently different from each other.
                                        Probably something that Rich would have to take a look at and be able to answer.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Capt QuirkC Capt Quirk

                                          @vortexwake
                                          Just had a very swift look at the texture sheets for some of the GA and they do appear to be different from each other.
                                          I'm wondering if it's something to do with the fallback textures and each repaint is using that for some peculiar reason.

                                          B200 Kingair passenger windows
                                          Kingair B200 passenger windows.jpg
                                          TG B200 Kingair passenger windows.jpg
                                          TG B200 compared with Orbx static B200 (in background)
                                          B200 Kingair TG compared with ORBX static.jpg

                                          V Offline
                                          V Offline
                                          vortexwake
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @Capt-Quirk
                                          B200 Kingair passenger windows

                                          That is just so wrong!.....😆

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users