• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum

Wrong Fahrenheit/Celsius conversion in the manual?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Piston & Turbine Dukes
4 Posts 3 Posters 209 Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MtheHellM Offline
    MtheHellM Offline
    MtheHell
    wrote on last edited by MtheHell
    #1

    I'm wondering, if there's a mistake with the conversion of the degrees in the manual - or do I miss something why they don't match?

    I'm looking to the leaning advice with the EDM-760 and e.g. in the ROP section, the manual reads (page 130):

    • "Lean Find mode is now armed, and an approximately 15°F (8°C) increase of average
      EGT has been observed."
    • and later: "At cruise power settings, this point is approximately 50-100°F (28-56°C) below peak EGT for
      best power."

    When I convert °F to °C, I get these results:
    15°F = -9,4°C
    50°F = 10°C
    100°F = 37,8°C

    Vice versa with the °C (above in brackets) converted to °F:
    8°C = 46,4°F
    28°C = 82,4°F
    56°C = 132,8°F

    I can use Fahrenheit in the EDM to get my peak temps and then aim for the 50°F, but I don't really know which °C values I should aim for when in Celsius display mode?

    RandolfR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RandolfR Offline
    RandolfR Offline
    Randolf
    replied to MtheHell on last edited by
    #2

    @MtheHell the problem here is that degrees Celsius and Fahrenheit have different zero point, so yes, 15 deg F above zero is approx. equal to -9.4 deg C below zero, however, if you are measuring relative change in deg C and F at around 200 C (392 F), if add 8 deg C, you get 208 C = 406 F, which is increase of 14 F (all values approximate), so the manual is about right. Just use either C or F as stated in the manual and don't mix them :)

    MtheHellM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MtheHellM Offline
    MtheHellM Offline
    MtheHell
    replied to Randolf on last edited by
    #3

    @Randolf Ahhh..! You see, I thought, there must be a reason for the differences.
    Thank you for clearing up the context. Then I stick to the numbers and feel good with it:)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RallerR Offline
    RallerR Offline
    Raller
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    And at -40 the two scales meet. Perplexing :-)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users