Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. Black Square Add-Ons
  5. TBM 850
  6. Vacuum/Gyro/EFIS/AHRS Systems modelled wrong or not at all

Vacuum/Gyro/EFIS/AHRS Systems modelled wrong or not at all

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved TBM 850
3 Posts 2 Posters 34 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Skrelk
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I was exploring failures and these systems because I wondered why there were two gyro slaving switches AND an AHRS switch. I was surprised to discover that failing a single system labelled "GYRO" in the EFB fails the EHSI and regular HSI, either slaving switch controls both the conventional HSI and EHSI, the AHRS switch does nothing. Further, failing the vacuum has no effect on any of the instruments

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Black SquareB Online
      Black SquareB Online
      Black Square
      Black Square Developer
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Looking at the code, the "Gyro" circuit is the remote compass, to which both the EHSI and HSI are slaved. The two remote compass control panels are redundant, but they could pretty easily be made to control two separate remote compasses. As for the vacuum failure, I believe that should only affect the standby attitude indicator (pilot's side), which will take some time to spin down and display the warning flag (or begin to tumble) after you trigger the failure. I don't have individual failures for the left and right ARHS that would affect the EADI, which I suppose can be taken to mean that both receive power through the same EADI circuit breaker. I can revisit some of these things and add additional failures before the next update to the TBM.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Skrelk
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Thank you! That all makes sense - the reason I think it's worth addressing in a future update is mainly because as implemented, a gyro failure would have a disproportionate effect because there isn't a back up

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users