Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. Black Square Add-Ons
  5. Starship
  6. Regarding the inertial separators

Regarding the inertial separators

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Starship
6 Posts 5 Posters 140 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Online
    M Online
    MD82
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Hello,

    after reading the manual and seeing the engine visualizer, I have a question regarding these. In normal configuration turboprops, indeed when taxiing on unprepared surfaces, you increase the risk of particles entering the engine. However, since the Starship air intakes are located way behind and above the leading edges of the wings, isn't there basically no threat of particle ingestion other than rain and other forms of precipitation? And maybe also shed ice from the leading edges? Contrary to the manual and visualizer?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Online
      J Online
      jmarkows
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      I would be interested in this. I had asked previously in a separate topic and never got a response.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • MarionetteworkM Offline
        MarionetteworkM Offline
        Marionettework
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        For pusher aircraft, the risk from unprepared surfaces would be to the props. Although in Starship's case, the main landing gear is spaced farther apart than the props, so perhaps it's not as bad. Maybe instead of inertial separators we should get mud flaps.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          intjmastermind
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Good point that the risk of ground FOD is pretty low compared to if the engines were conventionally mounted. I wonder if Nick models a lower rate of wear when operating without the separators compared to the TBM / King Air / Turbine Duke.

          OTOH the inertial seperators don’t really have a downside when on the ground unless you’re very performance limited on takeoff. I’m certain an owner-operator, or your boss if you’re flying his plane, would want to take every precaution possible to avoid a six-figure repair bill.

          Black SquareB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I intjmastermind

            Good point that the risk of ground FOD is pretty low compared to if the engines were conventionally mounted. I wonder if Nick models a lower rate of wear when operating without the separators compared to the TBM / King Air / Turbine Duke.

            OTOH the inertial seperators don’t really have a downside when on the ground unless you’re very performance limited on takeoff. I’m certain an owner-operator, or your boss if you’re flying his plane, would want to take every precaution possible to avoid a six-figure repair bill.

            Black SquareB Offline
            Black SquareB Offline
            Black Square
            Black Square Developer
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @intjmastermind said in Regarding the inertial separators:

            I wonder if Nick models a lower rate of wear when operating without the separators compared to the TBM / King Air / Turbine Duke.

            I do now 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • M Online
              M Online
              MD82
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Amazing!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users