Great philosophy and product, but I must be doing something wrong
-
@toby23 I see it exactly the same way.
It looks great, but I have so much data to download and edit! That is not in my mind. I want to enjoy a product. And not assemble it.I just hope JF adds more planes for this year. A343 -A346 and more.
-
Yes I agree, it would be better if the user would not need to assemble the product. At least, what I can confirm is that the product by itself seems to be functional, with the exception of the flight plans not resembling real life, and quite a few missing models and liveries.
-
@deepsky I agree with you there. FS Traffic is quite good. And also easy to use.
I don't know about FSLTL's performance right now, but that's exactly why I chose JF.
But therefore I hope that they still add many models -
@baxterchico I think for the performance, I have come to know that the performance heavily depends on how many AI aircraft you have moving in your Sim. E.g., if you have 50 airplanes moving, both FSLTL and FS Traffic will have a heavy impact on your CPU. Though I first thought FS Traffic has major benefits with regards to FPS, I'm now experiencing very similar results with both FSLTL and FS Traffic with regards to FPS at heavy AI traffic load. I think you won't have an FPS impact if you use a few FSLTL or AIG models here and there.
-
-
@toby23 Hi, I'm glad you like my pack. FS Traffic has added a few models and liveries. You'll still be able to use my pack, the only difference will at the moment be that instead of, e.g., a FS Traffic B757, you'll see an AIG 757. As FS Traffic's models are a little better than AIG's, I'm planning to update my pack so that in the future, FS Traffic planes will show whenever one is available. For the time being, you can continue to use my pack.
-
