• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum

Marking the physical Throttles (Bravo, etc.)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved RJ Professional
11 Posts 10 Posters 441 Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tcarmona
    wrote on last edited by tcarmona
    #1

    Hello, Great Plane!!! Congratulations!
    A little suggestion (if there isn't already an option for this): It would be interesting if the position of our physical throttles could be marked on the PED (N1?) when we turn off the Auto-Throttle (AT), with an arc, a dot... we could align the (Bravo or other) throttles manually (which do not automatically follow the N1 as we know), before turning off the AT for landing. This way wouldn't be a peak of thrust trying to guess the best position in a such delicate moment of the landing.
    (sorry the English)
    Thanks!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • RhinozherousR Offline
    RhinozherousR Offline
    Rhinozherous
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    +1 for this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    p919h_lm
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    +1 but with some additional input

    This needs to be optional, and perhaps we should take inspiration from pmdg implementation where we can either completely disable it, enable it when physical throttle is moving, or always enabled. But on a engine display screen it's less intrusive, but the ped is already using moving leds to denote n1.
    So I can think of two things to mitigate this,
    1, this should only be enabled when auto throttle is on and working and is not in an pilot overridable mode.
    2, optionally, this can also be done like what jf did in the f28 where they repurposed a led in the glareshield to illuminate when throttle is in sync with the target takeoff settings. If we can have a similar led in glare shield which will illuminate when the physical throttle position is within 2% of in game throttle position in either direction, this can be a helpful feature without being too intrusive.

    LaurrethL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Properly modelled, the THRUST LEVERS retain the position and N1 at AT disconnect. The ‘ball-park’ N1 for a 4 engined approach, gear down, 33* flap is typically 67 - 68% to maintain a 3* approach at Vref +5kts (the normal approach speed). Slightly fast or slow then decrease or increase from the datum figure a few %.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Sergekoko
    wrote on last edited by Sergekoko
    #5

    Also would like to see some type of optional indication of where my physical throttle is prior to AT disconnect, thought about this multiple times on final

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MarkM Offline
    MarkM Offline
    Mark JF Staff
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Thank you all for the feedback. We have logged this on our internal feature request tracker as something to look into for a future update.

    Mark - Just Flight

    Just Flight Development Assistant

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartynM Martyn referenced this topic on
  • LaurrethL Offline
    LaurrethL Offline
    Laurreth
    replied to p919h_lm on last edited by
    #7

    @p919h_lm said in Marking the physical Throttles (Bravo, etc.):

    This needs to be optional, and perhaps we should take inspiration from pmdg implementation

    Including the way it works, a blue dot travelling around the N1 gauge should do the trick I think?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Sergekoko
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Thats what i was thinking too, just a dot around the ring, maybe blue or like an inconspicuous gray, something that doesnt stand out

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jasemelbo
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    +1 for me too. Would love this as an option.
    Jase

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    NicoHKnol
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    +1, would be very helpfull
    Nico

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jan Nek
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    +1 this wound be nice

    Regards Janek

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users