• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum

TOD/VNAV cCalculation only correct for next, acitve waypoint

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 146 Professional
4 Posts 3 Posters 338 Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Chrjs
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    HI,
    overall a great update. I noticed a problem with the VNAV/TOD calculation of the UNS. It only calculates the descent rate and TOD of the next, currently active waypoint in your flightplan. Within the menu you can chose another waypoint for the calculation (for example another, later waypoint on the STAR for your descent calculation), this waypoint is even displayed as the current calculated descent, but the calculation is actually for the next (here invisible) next active waypoint. The calculation just restarts when you have overflown this next waypoint in line messing up your initial descent. I'm sure a fix shouldn't be too hard. Kind regards
    chris

    MarkM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MarkM Offline
    MarkM Offline
    Mark JF Staff
    replied to Chrjs on last edited by
    #2

    @Chrjs Thank you for reporting this. We have passed this onto the UNS-1 development team.

    Mark - Just Flight

    Just Flight Development Assistant

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    falcon71
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    I have just encountered the same issue.
    I flew to EINN via the TIPUR 2D arrival. I manually set the VNAV to waypoint to GILOG. However, the distance calculation was still to TIPUR and the altitude calculation was to 6000ft:
    before TIPUR
    Passing TIPUR, the calculations were now correct to GILOG:
    after TIPUR

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    falcon71
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    I tried it again with the latest update and I can confirm, that v0.2.1 fixed this issue. Thank you!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users