• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum

Range fuel burn

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Avro Vulcan B Mk. 2, K.2 & MRR
13 Posts 6 Posters 939 Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    swayne01
    wrote on last edited by swayne01
    #1

    Hi All,

    Firstly, I really love the Vulcan and have really enjoyed flying it.

    I was just wondering how people have been finding the range and fuel burn on the longer flights? I tried to do an Akrotiri (Cyprus) to Waddington flight earlier and found the Vulcan to be a bit more thirsty and I didn't manage to make it, even with a full fuel load and saddle tanks installed?

    Has anyone got any tips for getting the most range out of the Vulcan? Would be great to be able to do those ranger flights the aircraft was famous for.

    Cheers,

    Scott

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    CavalierDuck
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I join the OP in congratulating Just Flight for their amazing Vulcan.

    But I have also seen fuel burn issues when trying longer trips. I did a series of flights Scampton - Akrotiri - Gibraltar - Scampton. The first flight, ~1800nm, I did with full internal fuel plus full saddle tanks and landed with very little left, even with tail winds all the way. On the subsequent flights I focused on fuel consumption, and I can’t see how to get anywhere near the maximum range.

    The best conditions I have found so far are at altitudes 43,000ft - 52,000 feet, running the engines at 88-89% RPM. With these parameters I get a fuel flow of around 250 lbs/min, equating to 15,000lbs/hour. Even with a full maximum fuel load of ~98,000lbs (internal + cylindrical tanks), if you assume 450kts TAS then you’re looking at <3000nm maximum ferry range, far below the quoted ferry range of 4750 miles (4084 nm).

    It would be appreciated if Just Flight could have a look at this, as fuel management is one the principal considerations on longer trips!

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    amrit199
    replied to CavalierDuck on last edited by
    #3

    @CavalierDuck @swayne01 I think the fuel burn is realistic. Cruising at 50,000ft, I burnt 50% (37,000 lbs) for a flight of 800 NM. If you do the calculations, a 100% fuel load with the cylinder tanks installed (98,000 lbs) would give you a range of slightly above 2000 NM, which is quite close to the real life range of the Vulcan.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    CavalierDuck
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @amrit199 The Just Flight Vulcan manual, in agreement with a number of online sources, quotes the Vulcan's ferry range as 4,750 miles (~4,084 nautical miles). Other range figures, found in various places online, may be referring to what is sometimes called combat range (exact terminology varies) - the maximum range for a round-trip with ordnance and stores - which will be somewhere under half of the ferry range; close to 2,000 miles would be a realistic combat range, and consistent with the >4000 mile ferry range.

    I flew my test flights under ferry conditions. The fuel burn you obtained is consistent with my tests, but that places the Just Flight Vulcan's range considerably short of the >4000 mil ferry range quoted in the manual.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    amrit199
    replied to CavalierDuck on last edited by amrit199
    #5

    @CavalierDuck If that's the case, I, for one, would welcome the range increase since it would make round trips to and from Moscow easier, if ya know what I mean haha.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Delta558 Developer
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Sorry to have not responded sooner - still on holiday 😁

    Okay, that is an odd one because range was brought up in testing and prior to release we had somewhere a good way north of 7000km showing in the MSFS debug tool after top of climb. Just rechecked and it's now nearer 4000km.

    Something's obviously gone awry, will dig into it - thank you for bringing it to our attention.

    Just Flight FDE developer

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    swayne01
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @Delta558 that would be brilliant 😊 once again, many congratulations to the whole team on the Vulcan, it's a wonderful addon.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Delta558 Developer
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    A more precise adjustment will make the next release version, but for now if anybody wants the additional range and you're confident editing text files, open the Engines.cfg and scroll down to the jet_density_on_ff_table. Replace the entire line with the one below, should give you roughly 6500km (4000 mile) range in the 50,000ft zone.

    jet_density_on_ff_table = 0.000230:0.229000,0.000600:0.380000,0.000710:0.554000,0.000910:0.761000,0.001020:0.887000,0.001280:0.983000,0.001430:1.074000,0.001770:1.161000,0.002060:1.219100,0.002380:1.39600

    Ensure you climb at 250kts/93% rpm to 20,000ft then 300kts/96% rpm until that coincides with 0.8M then maintain the mach number. Top of climb, level out and let speed build to 0.87M and adjust throttles to maintain.

    Just Flight FDE developer

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    CavalierDuck
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @Delta558 Many thanks for looking at this! I'll test it out later today.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    CavalierDuck
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @Delta558 I tried the above mod, that’s fixed it nicely. Fuel flow at 48,000 feet was 143lb/min, which under ferry conditions should give a range >4000nm. And plenty for a round trip to Moscow with munitions…
    Thank you again! 👍

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    WIKANDEJ
    wrote on last edited by WIKANDEJ
    #11

    Hi folks,

    Just wanted to bump this since the update was released today and I didn't see the range/fuel flow fix listed on the changelog- was this actually included?

    -Jonas

    Edit: It would appear not, as at 48,000 ft the airplane burns roughly 250 lbs/minute, the pre-fix value.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartynM Offline
    MartynM Offline
    Martyn JF Staff
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    This fix will be included in the next update. In the meantime, you can make the change manually as described above.

    Martyn - Development Manager

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    WIKANDEJ
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @Martyn much appreciated, I wasn't sure if the fix would apply to FS2024 as well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users