The ground friction was set up based on the information provided in the aircraft's FCOMs. If you have any data to contradict what is being seen in the simulator, we would kindly ask you to raise a ticket with Just Flight Support via the following link and include any data: https://www.justflight.com/support Our development team can then review that data against the information in the FCOMs and the behaviour in the simulator, and make any changes if required. Mark - Just Flight

Thank you for the detailed feedback. We have logged this with your other feedback, and our development team will review this ahead of the next update to the 146/RJ. Mark - Just Flight

said in Excessive turbulence at low altitude: @Black-Square from my understanding talking to A2A, they use their own flight model and the turbulence is somehow interpolated by them before effecting the aircraft. It has come to my attention that I may be wrong about this... I'm now noticing an absence of turbulance other than the occasional bumps they inject in. Kind of a huge let down if that's the case.

^^ Take him up on it.

@vliah thanks for sharing, I have added a comment to your YT video, I believe you have built something similar to what I did some time ago.

Thank you for your answer. Sometimes it helps, when you just talk about it. I checked it again. The switch moves about "8 hours" counterclockwise, the green marker and the "On" label on the switch too. I don’t know why, but I was convinced it only moved 4 hours. That was my confusion. So everything is right and my inner monk can take a rest.

Thanks for letting me know. I should have remembered to recommend checking that, but alas, I forgot. Hopefully your message we be the reminder I need for the next user to ask. Let me know if there's ever anything else I can do for you!

Hey Nick @Black-Square. Question from the Dev... can you ask the dev at JustFlight to post a specific example of the EXACT URL that is used to trigger a failure? The docs list all the failure variables, but never seem to mention the specific elements of the URL, or the port, etc I was under the impression it was straight HTTP calls directly to a custom listener....he's literally listing URL paramters in the docs. [1:00 PM]Saturday, March 14, 2026 1:00 PM if you can post a message asking him to verify what I listed above, and whether this can be triggered by a vanilla HTTP request, outside of SimConnect, that would give me everything I need.

I think A DC3 with Piston and PT6 engine options would be insane too. Imagine a Boris P&W Supercharged Wasp engine...

@hangar_101 said in Checklist Preview: @pbrad74 yes, an extra button on the airport info would be great [image: 6c35748b-a4a3-4d90-8b15-b6dc6850f7d1.png] I understand what you mean now. I have just updated the Caravan checklist that will include the button/link for AISWEB. Please give me some time to update the other checklists as well. Also, I didn't mean to hijack this forum with my product so let's communicate through flgihtsim.to messaging instead. Thank you!

Hi Diggler, have you been able to sort this problem out?

Ah, thank you - now I understand :).

@SadBucket Just to be clear, Asobo has nothing to do with the MarketPlace. Asobo are just developers of the game; the MarketPlace, where the game and its contents are sold, is managed by Microsoft. Not sure if Steam or Playstation would handle the situation any differently TBH.

The only thing I can think of is that you're hearing the strobe light power supply. The Duke strobes work by charging and discharging high-voltage capacitors that illuminate the xenon flash tube strobe lights.

A Just Flight DC-9 would be awesome to see developed in the future for all of the above reasons by piedmonitor. I'd totally buy one as I have enjoyed the JF Avro RJ, BAe 146 and Fokker F28.

@Black-Square Thanks Nick. I'm probably the only one who has ever tested it, so don't lose sleep over it. Just the fact that you have acknowledged it is good for the time being. I'm sure in due time you will get around to fixing it. Cheers

@Chotter said in Aircraft age: Neither the best movie nor the best RPG could offer such a level of immersion. Now you're speaking my language! While there are many users who tell me they couldn't care less about the failure features in an aircraft, they have provided me with some of my most memorable simulator experiences. Even a simple item, like the "Cabin Door" annunciator lighting up on short final in IMC, as if just to spook you, is such a delight to me. While I have received your comments about aerodynamics and engine performance, I would still encourage you not to overlook the failure rate slider as your source of enjoyment for the Caravan. I very much understand your point, but at least in my estimation, a propeller governor failure or fuel control failure would be a much more entertaining and challenging experience than an engine routinely running a few degrees hotter due to its imagined age. Just my opinion, however!

Are there any plans for an updated FS Traffic manual to show the SETUP global settings for the latest MSFS 2024 version-would be extremely beneficial to me and others?