@DangerZoneDmo that’s a great post. LOP wasn’t talked about much when I flew GA aircraft back in the day. I don’t think I flew with any planes with Gami injectors so we just flew ROP. Now I just fly the bit metal tubes so my knowledge is just from watching YouTube videos or magazine. I’m guessing it’s a MSFS limitation because the mixture adjustment in general is very incorrect on most planes in MSFS. Maybe Blacksquare can do some tweaking in the future though to get it closer to your points.

Yay! Glad it was an easy fix for you. It will be in the next update for everyone else.

See answer in your other post.

I'll add my observations as well for 2020. Running a 4080 Super with 9800x 3D, downscaling ALL textures (VC, cabin etc) to 2K, hiding the EFB, and hiding the cabin, as well as lowering the gauge refresh rate nets me about 3-5 FPS in most scenarios. But, compared to the 146, F28, Fenix, PMDG products, and others; I'm running well lower 15-25+ FPS overall (typically 30-45 FPS for the Avro, 70-80+ for others in the same airport/weather/traffic scenarios). The RJ is definitely one of the hardest hitting products in my sim. I think I've exhausted most of the tricks trying to squeeze some more performance out of it, and would love to hear if any further optimizations could be made for it someday. Open to any other ideas anyone may have!

Thank you! I agree it's not horrible but the tiny screws disappearing on the panel in VR would be a welcome fix.

Thanks a lot for the quick reply. Problem solved !!

@jmarkows And......

Thanks for confirming, Nick. I had a heck of a time figuring out why Starship wouldn’t track the offset in VOR mode until I realized it doesn’t work that way.

@Black-Square Many thanks for your reply, and confirmation that nothing significant changed between the versions (as I suspected). That leaves the possibility that an OnAir update changed something, so I'll dive down that canyon now and see what I can see. And many thanks for an absolutely tremendous 'complex single'

Any hope for this at all?

@Petzep This is an excellent explanation of MTBF, and I have now pointed several other commenters in this direction to read it. Thank you for taking the time to write it

Although I'm always interested in more persistance and aircraft ownership features, it's really the inconsistency of Asobo's state saving that's holding me back. I don't want to create all these ownership features, just for some users to find their progress erased on some random load of their simulator. That would be more frustrating than not having the features, in my opinion! In the meantime, this conversation might interest you. It's all about how to think about MTBF, and how it differs from other damage models.

thank you to both of you. i would prefer to have control over the beta for better taxing. i give up some throttle range for that. bp_spets i will your setup thanks a lot!!