v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC
-
@DonFlavio said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
What I did was to got to national settings in Windows 10 and change the setting for decimal point from a comma to a point.
Hi Don,
I have been having the same issues with GA compile hanging since the recent update. Can you please explain how and where to do the decimal point thing in Win 10?
Thanks. -
@RogerD said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
@DonFlavio said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
What I did was to got to national settings in Windows 10 and change the setting for decimal point from a comma to a point.
Hi Don,
I have been having the same issues with GA compile hanging since the recent update. Can you please explain how and where to do the decimal point thing in Win 10?
Thanks.It’s ok, found it but it was already a decimal point. GA compile still hangs so back to an older version.
-
@Ray-Fry said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
@RogerD
TG will not let you go back to an older version.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/51123961836/in/dateposted-public/
I wish i could i would dump this version.Hi Ray,
Yes I know thanks, but I had two earlier versions backed up on my external hard drive. The earlier version works perfectly, compiled properly and I’m up and running again. Very frustrating though.
Thanks for your reply. -
@RogerD
I will try it soon but i think thats when TG started going pear shape , the present database is full of missing aircraft and livery's they know this that`s why they have now put a slider in for less realistic but more made up traffic, I hate to say this but I dont think we are going to see an update anytime soon this is a product that JF have less interest in now. -
Hi Derek,
It’s good too see you are monitoring this thread. Are you getting other reports of compile errors with this latest version? If not, then I guess I need to spend some time tracking why my system keeps hanging at the GA compile point. I note Ray in this thread is on P3Dv5.1, I’m loading on P3Dv4.5 -
@Derek
I am referring to left hand column aircraft . ERD. CNA .PL2 .ERJ .BH2 .E7W .146 Mahan air .221 Delta airlines.223 Korean airlines .290 Wideroe . 290 Finnair .310 Mahan air .313 Air Transat .318 Air France and more. 74Y . 74E .75W. 76F .76V .76W .76Y .77F . 77L .77W .77X . 781 . 7M8 . 7S8 . And thats not all of them and if your TG developers dont know this then they have a different Database than we have, And I will not go into livery names that I have not heard off in this part of the world, Early versions did not have this many faults forget real world database do like 360 and let the user pick a seasonal schedule without the errors.
Just my suggestion.PS And what about the tail numbers missing and not working, again reported before but JF looking in another direction and products I fear.
-
@Ray-Fry said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
the present database is full of missing aircraft and livery's they know this that`s why they have now put a slider in for less realistic but more made up traffic, I hate to say this but I dont think we are going to see an update anytime soon this is a product that JF have less interest in now.
Ray. I'm sure I've already explained this a couple of times now. The entries in the database you list above ARE NOT ERRORS. Remember previously when you listed some airlines, claimed they were fake and I linked you to their Wikipedia pages? The schedules in TG are the real world schedules that were sourced from a reputable and top of the line supplier. They are not made up, edited, enhanced or whatever else you think we're conspiring to do with them.
Yes, not all entries have an exactly corresponding aircraft in the fleet, but that is where the slider in the compiler comes in with the different levels of flight matching. For example, in the TG database there is an Aeroflot using the aircraft code 738. In the schedules database there are Aeroflot flights using 738 and 73W. We could just ignore all the 73W flights, or you can set the slider to a low level and it will look for any suitable looking "73x" substitutions. If you set the slider higher then if it cannot find a "73x" replacement it will sub in another Aeroflot aircraft in its place. Go higher still (optional of course) and if it can't find another Aeroflot aircraft it will swap in another livery using the same aircraft type.
If you don't like this feature, don't use it! -
@Rich
How come you have real world flight plans placing Mongolian Airlines in the UK and EU airports i was not aware they fly in this part of the world, and if you need a slider to create more traffic for missing aircraft do we take it your going to add them in the future, I ask that as you have not stated if or when the next update will be this Year.
How is replacing missing aircraft and livery's realistic AI that was stated when released.
Is the tail number missing by design intentional. -
@Ray-Fry said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
@Rich
How come you have real world flight plans placing Mongolian Airlines in the UK and EU airports i was not aware they fly in this part of the world, and if you need a slider to create more traffic for missing aircraft do we take it your going to add them in the future, I ask that as you have not stated if or when the next update will be this Year.
How is replacing missing aircraft and livery's realistic AI that was stated when released.
Is the tail number missing by design intentional.Coincidentally, this question was asked on another thread. I replied thus:
If you can contact support and advise the time and location of the flight you are seeing we can look into it. The software in Traffic Global gets its flights from a database, which is like a big spreadsheet. This is sourced from a commercially available supplier of such things and is the type of thing used by other airlines, travel agents and so forth. However, it can throw up anomalies such as re-named airlines, holding company operators and codesharing. It is also, of course, possible to have an error in it. For example, we could remove all reference to British Airways in the database and replace the airline with, say, Aeroflot, which would see Aeroflot operating the Glasgow shuttle each day. But we wouldn't do that.
Also, the database lists aircraft and airlines. For the flight, the airline and the aircraft to be placed in the game by TG, it requires a flight plan, an aircraft and a livery. The object of the software is to match the flights in the database with flight plans in the software, aircraft models and liveries.
Not every aircraft, airline and livery in the world can be included, so there is an option to use alternative liveries.
I think we have already explained to you how the flight legs work, so I won't go over that again.
So, if you can let us have details about the Mongolian flights we can see if this is due to codeshare, an alternative or if there is a bug.Worth reading that thread and then, if you can let us know the details via a support ticket, we can, of course, look into it.
-
@Derek ]
In other words we have what we have if we don`t like it use something else, we are not getting anything else.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/51129877909/in/dateposted-public/
And this with custom AFCAD empty parking KDFW 9am hence US users reporting lack of traffic. -
@Ray-Fry said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
@Derek ]
In other words we have what we have if we don`t like it use something else, we are not getting anything else.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/51129877909/in/dateposted-public/
And this with custom AFCAD empty parking KDFW 9am hence US users reporting lack of traffic.No, in the actual words I wrote, if you can give us a support ticket with some data we can look into it. What you have posted there seems to be a picture of an airport with a plane flying over it. Is that a Mongolian airlines plane? Pretty sure KFDW is not in the UK or Europe.
-
@RogerD said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
Hi Derek,
It’s good too see you are monitoring this thread. Are you getting other reports of compile errors with this latest version? If not, then I guess I need to spend some time tracking why my system keeps hanging at the GA compile point. I note Ray in this thread is on P3Dv5.1, I’m loading on P3Dv4.5If you raise a support ticket we may be able to get to the bottom of it.
-
@Derek said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
@Ray-Fry said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
@Derek ]
In other words we have what we have if we don`t like it use something else, we are not getting anything else.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/51129877909/in/dateposted-public/
And this with custom AFCAD empty parking KDFW 9am hence US users reporting lack of traffic.No, in the actual words I wrote, if you can give us a support ticket with some data we can look into it. What you have posted there seems to be a picture of an airport with a plane flying over it. Is that a Mongolian airlines plane? Pretty sure KFDW is not in the UK or Europe.
Their is no Mongolian airline in TG and JF must know that so it cannot load like other missing airlines.
KDFW was to show the lack of aircraft in the sim with this version of TG again JF should know that with users complain about the lack of parked aircraft at there addon airports,
BUT Most telling of all the lack of info for what is coming for TG if anything or is this the final build if so I will be OFF, That`s one way to get rid of me.I hate to say this but it sound like you and JF devs simmers don`t use there own TG for AI as you would know most of this.
-
@Ray-Fry said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
@Derek said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
@Ray-Fry said in v 1.1.2.2 GA TRAFFIC CARGO TRAFFIC:
@Derek ]
In other words we have what we have if we don`t like it use something else, we are not getting anything else.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/51129877909/in/dateposted-public/
And this with custom AFCAD empty parking KDFW 9am hence US users reporting lack of traffic.No, in the actual words I wrote, if you can give us a support ticket with some data we can look into it. What you have posted there seems to be a picture of an airport with a plane flying over it. Is that a Mongolian airlines plane? Pretty sure KFDW is not in the UK or Europe.
Their is no Mongolian airline in TG and JF must know that so it cannot load like other missing airlines.
KDFW was to show the lack of aircraft in the sim with this version of TG again JF should know that with users complain about the lack of parked aircraft at there addon airports,
BUT Most telling of all the lack of info for what is coming for TG if anything or is this the final build if so I will be OFF, That`s one way to get rid of me.I hate to say this but it sound like you and JF devs simmers don`t use there own TG for AI as you would know most of this.
"Their is no Mongolian airline in TG"
Which is why, when you said "How come you have real world flight plans placing Mongolian Airlines in the UK and EU airports" I asked for some examples. So far, none forthcoming.
"I hate to say this..."
Not on the evidence available so far."what is coming for TG if anything"
I am not sure what you are expecting. This is an AI traffic addon, not a FlightRadar24-type online subscription game. Tell us what you think the software should do that it doesn't do now. Remember, it is designed to add AI traffic to FSX and P3D and it does that very well. As I've explained time and time again, there is little point in updating the schedules given the current state of global aviation. Not sure what else we can do. -
@Derek
Well I will leave you with this KDFW FSDT Addon airport has 230 parking spots, TG has 112 flight plans not all can load due errors like KDFW - WSSS , KDFW- VHHH and so on timing error no slider can fix that, and have JF looked at how often the 320 is in error not because the airline is missing but because it should be 319 or 321 Aircraft for that livery now if JF don`t now this then they never tested this Database before release.
And depending on time of day some aircraft will be on route best time morning when loaded the screenshot was 9am local, and incoming flights have the same problem not loading due to errors flight time and aircraft and livery errors result less than 100 aircraft at the airport, and this is repeated at most major addon airports.
This is what TG could do 2years ago.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/46909521661/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/43152885062/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/27558221737/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/41596216424/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/42725591974/in/dateposted-public/
And the release version MAY 2018.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/41416660045/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/42271137352/in/dateposted-public/
TG has gone backwards in my opinion.
And finally this.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/154944674@N05/51132088880/in/dateposted-public/
As you can see this well above normal AI BGL traffic down to my editing out some of the errors like no swiss air in swiss airports wrong aircraft listed 320 likewise with other main airlines KLM ,Austrian, Iberia, TAP, Alitalia ,Lufthansa and so on, but you cannot make more traffic show at major airport without creating it yourself, and I suspect users will think you install and compile and there addon airport will be filled with traffic of real airlines for that airport.
