Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. MSFS Products
  4. DC Designs (F-14, F-15, F-16 etc)
  5. More ILS VLoc issues

More ILS VLoc issues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DC Designs (F-14, F-15, F-16 etc)
13 Posts 3 Posters 692 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S steveP

    @dc1973 thanks for the reply, but if you have time can you try BIKF RWY10….I tried many times without any success. BTW I’m not new to flightsim, many hours flying FSL CONCORDE X…BTW I have many hours flying Concorde X FSL

    DC1973D Offline
    DC1973D Offline
    DC1973
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @stevep Sure I will give it a go later and see what happens.

    DC1973D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • DC1973D DC1973

      @stevep Sure I will give it a go later and see what happens.

      DC1973D Offline
      DC1973D Offline
      DC1973
      wrote on last edited by DC1973
      #5

      @dc1973 Tested and working perfectly, intercepted the ILS at 15nm and 5,000ft, GLIDE engaged and Concorde tracked all the way in and landed with no pilot input. Sorry you're having issues but I cannot replicate them here.

      Screenshot (2963).jpg

      DC1973D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • DC1973D DC1973

        @dc1973 Tested and working perfectly, intercepted the ILS at 15nm and 5,000ft, GLIDE engaged and Concorde tracked all the way in and landed with no pilot input. Sorry you're having issues but I cannot replicate them here.

        Screenshot (2963).jpg

        DC1973D Offline
        DC1973D Offline
        DC1973
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        I did take other shots but these hopefully show Concorde doing what it should.

        Screenshot (2968).jpg

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • DC1973D DC1973

          I did take other shots but these hopefully show Concorde doing what it should.

          Screenshot (2968).jpg

          S Offline
          S Offline
          steveP
          wrote on last edited by steveP
          #7

          @dc1973 thanks for your help, I know you must be so busy, I’ll try again, which IAF did you use? I’m using ILS Z procedure. Also in the second screen shot you seem to be below the GS…Did you TOGA? It just doesn’t seem very accurate to me. Quick question would it be possible to add height call outs for landing….? BTW I’ve not seen any video for Concorde MSFS, that uses correct procedures for landing her..I don’t know what your landing weight is but 190 knots seems fast

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S steveP

            @dc1973 thanks for your help, I know you must be so busy, I’ll try again, which IAF did you use? I’m using ILS Z procedure. Also in the second screen shot you seem to be below the GS…Did you TOGA? It just doesn’t seem very accurate to me. Quick question would it be possible to add height call outs for landing….? BTW I’ve not seen any video for Concorde MSFS, that uses correct procedures for landing her..I don’t know what your landing weight is but 190 knots seems fast

            S Offline
            S Offline
            steveP
            wrote on last edited by steveP
            #8

            @stevep Just a note but you seem to have 50T+ of fuel onboard, the more I look at it Screenshot 2 the more I think TOGA it just isn't right is it...never mind being overweight to land, did you land?
            What landing rate did you have 1000 plus I guess😁

            JFYI: APP ILS 10-Z, VIA SONAX, STAR BASL3M procedure used for my flight

            DC1973D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S steveP

              @stevep Just a note but you seem to have 50T+ of fuel onboard, the more I look at it Screenshot 2 the more I think TOGA it just isn't right is it...never mind being overweight to land, did you land?
              What landing rate did you have 1000 plus I guess😁

              JFYI: APP ILS 10-Z, VIA SONAX, STAR BASL3M procedure used for my flight

              DC1973D Offline
              DC1973D Offline
              DC1973
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @stevep No special approaches, just a manual intercept as described and set GLIDE mode to autoland.

              Yes, 50 tons is heavy but it was only to demonstrate that Concorde could do the ILS approach, so I just started on Keflavik's runway and flew a large circuit. It's why I selected 190 KIAS as the landing speed. Just before touchdown I manually flared, I think it was 300fpm when it landed but can't remember. Normally I'd like to see less than 30 tons fuel for landing.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                delfin25
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                There seems to be a problem with the logic of the autopilot and the INS system in my opinion. Normally, when I activate VOR/LOC in RAD mode, the TRK HDG or HOLD HDG button is automatically deactivated. As long as this works, the autopilot will also find the beam and adapt to it. The same applies to LAND or GLIDE mode. As long as that works, the ILS approach will also succeed. If now but once the INS button
                is pressed in INS mode and then switched back to RAD mode, this logic no longer works in the above modes and the TRK HDG or HOLD HDG mode is no longer automatically deactivated during the entire flight. I found this out on my system in long experiments.

                DC1973D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D delfin25

                  There seems to be a problem with the logic of the autopilot and the INS system in my opinion. Normally, when I activate VOR/LOC in RAD mode, the TRK HDG or HOLD HDG button is automatically deactivated. As long as this works, the autopilot will also find the beam and adapt to it. The same applies to LAND or GLIDE mode. As long as that works, the ILS approach will also succeed. If now but once the INS button
                  is pressed in INS mode and then switched back to RAD mode, this logic no longer works in the above modes and the TRK HDG or HOLD HDG mode is no longer automatically deactivated during the entire flight. I found this out on my system in long experiments.

                  DC1973D Offline
                  DC1973D Offline
                  DC1973
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @delfin25 A bit hard to decipher what you actually mean, but with INS selected TRK HDG and TRK HOLD are automatically over-ridden. In RAD mode, INS needs to be off usually. There are answers coming through from other users to this question on the MS forums where you also posted it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Offline
                    D Offline
                    delfin25
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    After intensive research, I have now been able to successfully complete some ILS approaches in autoland mode. In my case the reason for the irritating behavior of the autopilot was a manipulation of a 3rd party application (PF3) via FSUIPC. This means that even a clean community folder (PMS and TDS GTNxi are special candidates here) does not protect against interference. This will cause problems for many MSFS developers in the future.

                    DC1973D 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • D delfin25

                      After intensive research, I have now been able to successfully complete some ILS approaches in autoland mode. In my case the reason for the irritating behavior of the autopilot was a manipulation of a 3rd party application (PF3) via FSUIPC. This means that even a clean community folder (PMS and TDS GTNxi are special candidates here) does not protect against interference. This will cause problems for many MSFS developers in the future.

                      DC1973D Offline
                      DC1973D Offline
                      DC1973
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @delfin25 Thanks for sharing this. A conflict with FSUIPC was not something I had thought of - I'll have to add it to the list of possible issues that can affect aircraft in MSFS.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users