Engine variants?



  • It mentions here the engine options but is there any more info on exactly what options there is?

    747-100 (JT9D) -3A / -7A etc?

    • 747-200 (JT9D, CF6 and RB211)
    • 747-200F (JT9D, CF6 and RB211, functioning main deck cargo doors)


  • Having the JT9D-70A, while niche and pretty uncommon, would also be quite a nice addition. It bears a striking resemblance to the CF6-50 but it is very much visually different.
    alt text



  • At the very least, you’d hope the -100 had the JT9D-7A.
    The -200 maybe the -7J, Or -7Q.
    And the -200F perhaps the -7R4G2 etc.

    It will be interesting what will be offered and how they managed to get all the performance data for them.



  • The developers must be busy. hmmm


  • JF Staff

    Very busy as always 👍 As per the forum rules this is an area for people to discuss our products and we can't guarantee a reply to every thread, although we do our very best!

    I've replied to another thread with screenshots showing the three available engine variants - https://community.justflight.com/topic/252/wonky-animations/5

    We don't intend to include sub-variants of the three engine types, unless there is sufficient demand for them post-release, as we need to strike a balance between achieving absolute accuracy across the three aircraft types (100/200/200F) and delivering a finished product in a reasonable time-frame that will meet the expectations of the majority of customers. As you can appreciate, the 747 with its many variants, and engine variants within those, could keep us busy for the next decade if we didn't draw the line somewhere.



  • @Jon_OZ said in Engine variants?:

    It will be interesting what will be offered and how they managed to get all the performance data for them.

    To give you an idea on where some of the performance data has been obtained, the RB211 has been created using the graphs and charts from a hardcopy of the BA RB211-524D4 Cruise Control manual (part of a set of original flight engineer manuals I own). That's a lot of pages of really fine detail!



  • Thanks for the reply. Can also understand the work involved in developing this.
    I was particularity curious in the JT9D version you're going to use, you're also modelling the -100?



  • @Martyn said in Engine variants?:

    Very busy as always 👍 As per the forum rules this is an area for people to discuss our products and we can't guarantee a reply to every thread, although we do our very best!

    I've replied to another thread with screenshots showing the three available engine variants - https://community.justflight.com/topic/252/wonky-animations/5

    We don't intend to include sub-variants of the three engine types, unless there is sufficient demand for them post-release, as we need to strike a balance between achieving absolute accuracy across the three aircraft types (100/200/200F) and delivering a finished product in a reasonable time-frame that will meet the expectations of the majority of customers. As you can appreciate, the 747 with its many variants, and engine variants within those, could keep us busy for the next decade if we didn't draw the line somewhere.

    I think the only one that would really need to be added to the already existing list is the JT9D-70A, as it had a completely different cowling, so it would be a nice addition for accuracy related to the planes that did have those engines. Visually the other JT9D variants were the same, aside from the earliest variants which had blow-in doors behind the outside leading edge. However, they're probably suited for a cheap expansion pack after the fact, along with other missing 747 classic variants. Trying to cram them all into one pack released at once would make for an expensive addon that probably would never come out in a timely fashion.



  • The reason I ask is it would be a shame the -100 had engines it never had in real life. It would loose credibility pretty quick.



  • Still a little concerned as to what PW is fitted to the -100/200. Here's hoping you guys dont get it wrong.



  • @Jon_OZ
    -3A, -7, 7A, were the engine variants for the -100.
    The previous JF 747-100 had the JT9D- 74RG2 which was a wrong and an embarrassing option.
    Hopefully they don’t make the same ill-I formed choice.