Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
Collapse
Just Flight Community Forum
  1. Home
  2. Just Flight
  3. In Development
  4. 747 Classic
  5. 747 Classic Progress

747 Classic Progress

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 747 Classic
409 Posts 44 Posters 264.5k Views 15 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Noob21

    @JoeNuts oh I’m sure he is only responsible for the systems, I can’t expect anyone to do all that work, especially when the systems are so complex, I was just saying how I hope the modeling team fix some of the errors with the exterior model as it looks a bit lackluster, especially compared to some of JF’s other aircraft like their upcoming A300 which looks fantastic.

    JoeNutsJ Offline
    JoeNutsJ Offline
    JoeNuts
    wrote on last edited by JoeNuts
    #277

    @Noob21 I agree, I guess we will see about that in the next update (whenever that might be) :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Offline
      C Offline
      CptKiddAPI
      wrote on last edited by
      #278

      Ijust hope that when it is finished it is true to the original 747 and not a -100 with all the mods that it saw through the years. Please dont airbus a classic beauty.

      SimeonWilburyS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C CptKiddAPI

        Ijust hope that when it is finished it is true to the original 747 and not a -100 with all the mods that it saw through the years. Please dont airbus a classic beauty.

        SimeonWilburyS Offline
        SimeonWilburyS Offline
        SimeonWilbury
        wrote on last edited by
        #279

        @CptKiddAPI There are already going to be options available with regards to the avionics equipment, so the original -100 FD and AP will be included I believe

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          tb10driver
          wrote on last edited by
          #280

          I'm pretty sure the that each Autopilot (and Flight Director) was hard-wired to its own INS, so A-1, B-2, and C-3, although the pilot's instrument source information could be switched from one side to the other, using the series of switches at the bottom of the pilot's panels.

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T tb10driver

            I'm pretty sure the that each Autopilot (and Flight Director) was hard-wired to its own INS, so A-1, B-2, and C-3, although the pilot's instrument source information could be switched from one side to the other, using the series of switches at the bottom of the pilot's panels.

            B Offline
            B Offline
            B744ERF
            wrote on last edited by B744ERF
            #281

            @tb10driver said in 747 Classic Progress:

            I'm pretty sure the that each Autopilot (and Flight Director) was hard-wired to its own INS, so A-1, B-2, and C-3, although the pilot's instrument source information could be switched from one side to the other, using the series of switches at the bottom of the pilot's panels.

            Correct.

            If an INS dumps and can't be used anymore for navigation, you need to engage another autopilot channel.

            The source switches are for the instrumentation, not flight guidance.

            The HSI has small flags denoting from which source it is presently displaying information.

            Best regards,
            Robin.

            JustFlight 747 Classic Developer

            JoeNutsJ 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • B B744ERF

              @tb10driver said in 747 Classic Progress:

              I'm pretty sure the that each Autopilot (and Flight Director) was hard-wired to its own INS, so A-1, B-2, and C-3, although the pilot's instrument source information could be switched from one side to the other, using the series of switches at the bottom of the pilot's panels.

              Correct.

              If an INS dumps and can't be used anymore for navigation, you need to engage another autopilot channel.

              The source switches are for the instrumentation, not flight guidance.

              The HSI has small flags denoting from which source it is presently displaying information.

              Best regards,
              Robin.

              JoeNutsJ Offline
              JoeNutsJ Offline
              JoeNuts
              wrote on last edited by
              #282

              @B744ERF Thanks for the explanation, I’m not that familiar with the triple INS setup yet

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • SimeonWilburyS SimeonWilbury

                @CptKiddAPI There are already going to be options available with regards to the avionics equipment, so the original -100 FD and AP will be included I believe

                C Offline
                C Offline
                CptKiddAPI
                wrote on last edited by
                #283

                @SimeonWilbury I am glad to hear this, I prefer the original INS setup and original overall setup over mods from the latter years like fms etc.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • JoeNutsJ Offline
                  JoeNutsJ Offline
                  JoeNuts
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #284

                  This might be a little bit early to ask but do you intend to bring the same system depth (for example the complex simulation of the pressurization system, accurate AP/AT behaviour, etc.) to the X-Plane version as well once the time comes? Hope it will be very close the wonderful P3D version in terms of simulation depth.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • JoeNutsJ JoeNuts

                    @B744ERF Thanks for the explanation, I’m not that familiar with the triple INS setup yet

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    B744ERF
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #285

                    @JoeNuts said in 747 Classic Progress:

                    @B744ERF Thanks for the explanation, I’m not that familiar with the triple INS setup yet

                    Triple INS has several benefits, and is required for oceanic flight:

                    • Redundancy (3 units are better than two)
                    • Three units are the minimum required for position mixing

                    Position mixing is where the inertial positions of all three INS are mixed (NOT averaged) using a specific algorithm that weights the individual inertial positions to produce the "mixed position", that represents the aircraft position for all navigation.

                    In triple mix, each INS does the following:

                    • Determines its own inertial position at all times
                    • Reads position data from the other two units
                    • Calculates the mix position
                    • Compares its data with the other units
                    • If they agree, then they all use the same position mix data which is applied as a correction to their own internal inertial position
                    • The triple mix position data is updated as the aircraft flies and the above functions repeat
                    • If a unit diverges from the triple position too much (drift rate too high or position invalid) then the system reverts to single-unit operation but maintains the last good triple mix update (in single-unit mode, the triple mix update can be cleared from each unit by the pilot should it be inaccurate).

                    Even in single-unit mode, there are continuous checks on various sub-systems, and depending on what faults are detected, generates error codes.

                    Most position faults are terminal in flight and can't be corrected. The only positional error that can be fixed is a bad position update, but generally once a unit loses its position, it can only be used for attitude information.

                    If a platform "topples" (literally stops remaining parallel to the local surface) then the unit is completely inoperative and must be switched off.

                    Local surface refers to the Earth's surface directly underneath the aircraft/unit.

                    JustFlight 747 Classic Developer

                    JoeNutsJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    5
                    • B B744ERF

                      @JoeNuts said in 747 Classic Progress:

                      @B744ERF Thanks for the explanation, I’m not that familiar with the triple INS setup yet

                      Triple INS has several benefits, and is required for oceanic flight:

                      • Redundancy (3 units are better than two)
                      • Three units are the minimum required for position mixing

                      Position mixing is where the inertial positions of all three INS are mixed (NOT averaged) using a specific algorithm that weights the individual inertial positions to produce the "mixed position", that represents the aircraft position for all navigation.

                      In triple mix, each INS does the following:

                      • Determines its own inertial position at all times
                      • Reads position data from the other two units
                      • Calculates the mix position
                      • Compares its data with the other units
                      • If they agree, then they all use the same position mix data which is applied as a correction to their own internal inertial position
                      • The triple mix position data is updated as the aircraft flies and the above functions repeat
                      • If a unit diverges from the triple position too much (drift rate too high or position invalid) then the system reverts to single-unit operation but maintains the last good triple mix update (in single-unit mode, the triple mix update can be cleared from each unit by the pilot should it be inaccurate).

                      Even in single-unit mode, there are continuous checks on various sub-systems, and depending on what faults are detected, generates error codes.

                      Most position faults are terminal in flight and can't be corrected. The only positional error that can be fixed is a bad position update, but generally once a unit loses its position, it can only be used for attitude information.

                      If a platform "topples" (literally stops remaining parallel to the local surface) then the unit is completely inoperative and must be switched off.

                      Local surface refers to the Earth's surface directly underneath the aircraft/unit.

                      JoeNutsJ Offline
                      JoeNutsJ Offline
                      JoeNuts
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #286

                      @B744ERF Hi, I know that you don't really speculate on a release date yet, but as things currently stand would you say that a release sometime this year might be realistic or do you think it'll take longer than that? Thanks.

                      V 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • JoeNutsJ JoeNuts

                        @B744ERF Hi, I know that you don't really speculate on a release date yet, but as things currently stand would you say that a release sometime this year might be realistic or do you think it'll take longer than that? Thanks.

                        V Offline
                        V Offline
                        Voice of Reason
                        JF Staff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #287

                        @JoeNuts Should be this year, yes. Sooner rather than too much later too. Fingers crossed.

                        centurion88C 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • V Voice of Reason

                          @JoeNuts Should be this year, yes. Sooner rather than too much later too. Fingers crossed.

                          centurion88C Offline
                          centurion88C Offline
                          centurion88
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #288

                          @Voice-of-Reason
                          Could you please release some vids demonstrated the sounds of cockpit and engines? Just like what you've done with Bae 146 and A300.

                          V 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • centurion88C centurion88

                            @Voice-of-Reason
                            Could you please release some vids demonstrated the sounds of cockpit and engines? Just like what you've done with Bae 146 and A300.

                            V Offline
                            V Offline
                            Voice of Reason
                            JF Staff
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #289

                            @centurion88 Will try our best to sort some for you, just balancing between progressing the code and getting new In dev material out to you patience people. Thanks, just bear with us.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • JoeNutsJ Offline
                              JoeNutsJ Offline
                              JoeNuts
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #290

                              Oh yes, can't wait to hear the deafening screaming of the CF6 :)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • centurion88C Offline
                                centurion88C Offline
                                centurion88
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #291

                                Any progress?

                                V 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • centurion88C centurion88

                                  Any progress?

                                  V Offline
                                  V Offline
                                  Voice of Reason
                                  JF Staff
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #292

                                  @centurion88 There is yes but it's not the fastest of progress and there's nothing we're able to show currently. We hope to be able to bring you up to speed within the next couple of weeks with some new In. dev content. Do bear with us and thanks for your patience.

                                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • V Voice of Reason

                                    @centurion88 There is yes but it's not the fastest of progress and there's nothing we're able to show currently. We hope to be able to bring you up to speed within the next couple of weeks with some new In. dev content. Do bear with us and thanks for your patience.

                                    I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    iainp93
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #293

                                    @Voice-of-Reason No sweat, JF - while a few folk are getting a bit short on here its only because it's such a highly anticipated aircraft. We're only glad that someone has decided to develop these classics. Thanks for putting up with the attitudes!

                                    SimeonWilburyS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • I iainp93

                                      @Voice-of-Reason No sweat, JF - while a few folk are getting a bit short on here its only because it's such a highly anticipated aircraft. We're only glad that someone has decided to develop these classics. Thanks for putting up with the attitudes!

                                      SimeonWilburyS Offline
                                      SimeonWilburyS Offline
                                      SimeonWilbury
                                      wrote on last edited by SimeonWilbury
                                      #294

                                      @iainp93 I've been waiting long enough for a good study level 747 Classic that another year or two of waiting won't bring all too much sweat if the result is worth waiting for. I am instead taking the time in waiting to assemble my airport collection so I have a nice broad collection of Routes to fly when I can finally commission one for my fleet :)

                                      A I 2 Replies Last reply
                                      2
                                      • SimeonWilburyS SimeonWilbury

                                        @iainp93 I've been waiting long enough for a good study level 747 Classic that another year or two of waiting won't bring all too much sweat if the result is worth waiting for. I am instead taking the time in waiting to assemble my airport collection so I have a nice broad collection of Routes to fly when I can finally commission one for my fleet :)

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        APJR
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #295

                                        @SimeonWilbury said in 747 Classic Progress:

                                        @iainp93 I've been waiting long enough for a good study level 747 Classic that another year or two of waiting won't bring all too much sweat if the result is worth waiting for. I am instead taking the time in waiting to assemble my airport collection so I have a nice broad collection of Routes to fly when I can finally commission one for my fleet :)

                                        I've been collecting every bit of classic 747 routes I can get my hand on in preparation

                                        SimeonWilburyS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • JoeNutsJ Offline
                                          JoeNutsJ Offline
                                          JoeNuts
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #296

                                          While I wont necessarily fly any routes that have been handled by 747 Classics in real life, I have still planned my first routes which will cover a lot of airports around the world. And of course my first flight will start at Paine Field in Everett. :)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users