<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Fuel condition lever idle speeds]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">A quick question on the fuel condition lever idle speeds:</p>
<p dir="auto">At around 15°C OAT on the ground, bleed air off, stabilised:<br />
Low Idle sits around 54% Ng, High Idle around 58% Ng. As far as I know the book values are 52% and 65% respectively, is that right?</p>
<p dir="auto">I understand idle speeds vary a little with temperature, so the slightly high Low Idle doesn't surprise me. What does surprise me is that the two deviate in opposite directions: Low Idle a touch high, but High Idle notably low. The value is stable and independent of power lever position within the idle/beta range, and the engine does reach 65% Ng once I advance the power lever into the power range, so it can get there, just not at high idle itself.</p>
<p dir="auto">Is the high idle governing intended to sit this low, or should it be closer to 65%? Just want to make sure I'm reading it right. Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.justflight.com/topic/11012/fuel-condition-lever-idle-speeds</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:58:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.justflight.com/topic/11012.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:09:25 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Fuel condition lever idle speeds on Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:24:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks, that makes sense. I'd only seen the default Caravan at 65 and assumed a sim update had changed it. Appreciate the explanation.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.justflight.com/post/52557</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.justflight.com/post/52557</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[freemind]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:24:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Fuel condition lever idle speeds on Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:19:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/freemind">@<bdi>freemind</bdi></a> This is one of the worst places where I run up against MSFS's terribly inadequate turbine engine simulation.  I'll spare you a lot of the details, but the gas generator idle RPM puts me between a rock and a hard place like few other things in the simulation.  It's virtually impossible to get a good spread and good acceleration from low to high idle without also generating too much static thrust, making the aircraft difficult to taxi, and difficult to slow down.  I've spent a long time trying to coax anything better out of the simulation, but I'm afraid those couple of percent are here to stay for now.  I can apply <em>yet another layer</em> of corrections on top of those numbers, but with every layer, the aircraft become exponentially harder to maintain.  I hope you understand these tradeoffs that I make as a developer.  I know some things must seem like they are easy, while others seem difficult, and it can be very hard to predict which is which from the outside.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.justflight.com/post/52556</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.justflight.com/post/52556</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Black Square]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:19:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>