<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Engine N1 readings]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Did these planes really cruise with only a N1 value of 77-78% at FL 300 to FL 350? (That's at .68 to .70 mach)</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.justflight.com/topic/10732/engine-n1-readings</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 17:07:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.justflight.com/topic/10732.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:41:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Engine N1 readings on Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:26:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thank you. Could you please attach a copy of that page from the manual to this post if you don't mind. Would be much appreciated.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.justflight.com/post/51291</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.justflight.com/post/51291</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chipmunck58]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:26:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Engine N1 readings on Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:11:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Yes that's spot on. The flight with unreliable airspeed section of the manual suggests to set 78% N1 which would result in Mach 0.70 at FL300.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.justflight.com/post/51224</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.justflight.com/post/51224</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JF John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:11:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>